Accounting Outsourcing Cost vs Hiring: Which Saves CFOs $275K/Year?

Most CFOs ask the wrong question when evaluating their finance team strategy.

They ask: "Is outsourcing cheaper than hiring?"

But cheaper isn't the point. The real question is, "Will this get me faster closes, better accuracy, and free my team to do strategic work instead of data entry?"

Because here's what actually matters: your current finance team is drowning in transaction processing. 

Your month-end close takes 15 days. Your senior accountant just gave notice, and you're looking at 3-6 months to replace them. 

And every hour your team spends on AP/AR reconciliations is an hour they're not analyzing why customer acquisition cost jumped 40% last quarter.

This article gives you the complete financial breakdown: in-house hiring vs. outsourcing. Not just the salary numbers everyone looks at, but the hidden costs that make the real difference. 

Recruiting fees. Turnover. Training time. The opportunity cost of having your best people doing work that could be automated or delegated.

By the end, you'll know exactly which model makes sense for your company size, complexity, and growth trajectory. And you'll have the numbers to back it up.
‍

The True Cost of Building Your In-House Accounting Team

When most CFOs budget for hiring, they look at salaries. That's a mistake.

Here's what it actually costs to build a 3-person accounting team in-house:
‍

Personnel Costs

Controller

• Base salary: $120,000
• Benefits (25%): $30,000
• Total: $150,000

Senior Accountant

• Base salary: $85,000
• Benefits (25%): $21,250
• Total: $106,250

Junior Accountant

• Base salary: $55,000
• Benefits (25%): $13,750
• Total: $68,750

Subtotal for personnel: $325,000
‍

The Hidden Costs Everyone Forgets

Payroll taxes (FICA, unemployment, etc.): ~10% of total comp = $32,500

Recruiting costs:

• External recruiter fees (20-25% of first-year salary): $18,000 for Controller, $12,000 for Senior Accountant
• Internal HR time for sourcing, screening, interviewing
• Total: $30,000-$35,000

Onboarding and training:

• First 90 days at reduced productivity (estimate 50% efficiency)
• Training materials, process documentation
• Senior staff time for mentoring
• Total: $10,000-$15,000

Tools and software allocation:

• NetSuite seats (3 full users): $3,000/year
• Expensify, Bill.com, or AP automation tools: $3,600/year
• Microsoft Office, Slack, project management: $1,800/year
• Continued education and certifications: $6,000/year
• Total: $14,400/year

Facilities and overhead:

• Office space (3 employees x $8,000/year avg): $24,000
• Equipment (laptops, monitors, furniture): $9,000
• IT support allocation: $6,000
• Total: $39,000
  ‍

Year 1 Total Cost: $451,000-$456,000

And that's assuming zero turnover.

If your Senior Accountant leaves after 18 months (industry average tenure is 2.5 years), add another $30,000 in recruiting and onboarding costs. If your Junior Accountant gets promoted or poached after 12 months, add another $20,000.

Now let's look at the alternative.
‍

The Outsourcing Model: What You Actually Pay

Outsourcing isn't just "hiring cheaper people overseas." It's shifting your operational model from headcount management to service delivery.

Here's what it costs:
‍

Service-Based Pricing

AP/AR Processing:

• Invoice entry, payment processing, collections support
• Cost: $2,000-$2,500/month
• Annual: $24,000-$30,000

GL Maintenance and Month-End Close Support:

• Journal entries, reconciliations, variance analysis prep
• Cost: $3,000-$4,000/month
• Annual: $36,000-$48,000

Bank Reconciliation:

• Daily cash monitoring, monthly bank recs
• Cost: $500-$750/month
• Annual: $6,000-$9,000

Month-End Financial Close Preparation:

• Subledger reconciliations, accruals, reporting support
• Cost: $1,500-$2,000/month
• Annual: $18,000-$24,000

Subtotal for outsourced services: $84,000-$111,000
‍

Internal Oversight Costs

You still need someone internal to manage the relationship, review work, and handle strategic finance. But instead of 3 full-time people, you need 0.5 FTE of a Finance Manager or senior-level person.

Internal Finance Manager (0.5 FTE):

• Salary: $90,000 x 0.5 = $45,000
• Benefits (25%): $11,250
• Total: $56,250
  ‍

Vendor and Tool Costs

Outsourcing vendor fees: Included in service costs above

Software/tools:

• NetSuite or ERP (reduced seats): $1,000/year
• Collaboration tools (Slack, Asana): $600/year
• Document sharing (Google Workspace): $400/year
• Vendor management overhead: $8,000/year
• Total: $10,000/year
  ‍

Year 1 Total Cost with Outsourcing: $150,250-$177,250

Annual savings vs. in-house team: $274,000-$306,000

That's a 60-65% cost reduction in year one.

But cost is only half the story.
‍

Head-to-Head Comparison: The Full Picture

Here's what the two models look like side-by-side over 3 years:

‍

Over 3 years, outsourcing saves you nearly $900,000.

But let's talk about what you actually get for that investment.
‍

Beyond Cost: The Hidden ROI of Outsourcing

The financial savings are obvious. But the operational gains are where outsourcing really pays off.
‍

1. Accuracy Improvement: From 3% Errors to 0.5%

In-house teams are human. They're also juggling multiple responsibilities, which means errors slip through.

Industry benchmarks show that manual accounting processes have a 2-5% error rate depending on complexity. That means:

• Incorrect journal entries
• Missed accruals
• Reconciliation discrepancies
• Misclassified expenses

Outsourced teams with process-driven workflows and dedicated quality control typically run at 0.3-0.8% error rates.

What does that mean in dollars?

If you're processing 5,000 transactions per month and your error rate drops from 3% to 0.5%, you're eliminating 125 errors per month. Each error takes 30-60 minutes to identify and fix. 

That's 60-125 hours saved per month, or $3,600-$7,500 in labor costs at $60/hour fully loaded.

Annual savings from accuracy improvement alone: $43,200-$90,000

One promotional products supplier we worked with was struggling with exchange rate errors on their international invoices. Manual recalculations were adding 6-8 hours per close. We automated the currency validation process, and close-related rework dropped to zero. 

Time saved: 96 hours per year.
‍

2. Close Time Reduction: From 15 Days to 5 Days

Outsourced teams run continuous reconciliations, not month-end fire drills.

When your outsourced team is reconciling AP, AR, and bank accounts daily, you're not starting from zero on day 1 of the close. You're validating what's already been done.

We covered this in depth in our month-end close acceleration article, but here's the short version:

Faster close = better decisions.

If you close 10 days faster, your board gets financials 10 days sooner. Your executive team has 10 extra days to act on the data. Your forecast for next quarter is based on complete information, not estimates.

Value of 10 days saved per month:

Assume your executive team's time is worth $300/hour (conservative for C-suite). If faster financials enable 5 hours of better strategic decision-making per close, that's $1,500/month in value, or $18,000/year.

And that's not counting the compounding effect of better decisions leading to revenue growth or cost avoidance.
‍

3. Freed-Up Team Time: 200+ Hours Per Month

When you outsource transactional work, your internal team stops being order-takers and starts being analysts.

• Instead of entering invoices, they're analyzing vendor spend trends.
• Instead of reconciling bank accounts, they're modeling cash flow scenarios.
• Instead of formatting reports, they're presenting insights to leadership.

How much time gets freed up?

If your outsourced team handles AP/AR processing, GL maintenance, and reconciliations, you're offloading roughly:

• 80 hours/month in AP/AR processing
• 60 hours/month in reconciliations
• 40 hours/month in journal entry prep
• 20 hours/month in reporting prep

Total: 200 hours/month

If your Finance Manager is currently spending 50% of their time on these tasks, outsourcing lets them shift to 100% strategic work. 

That's worth tens of thousands in better forecasting, variance analysis, and decision support.
‍

4. Reduced Turnover Risk

Here's what nobody talks about: accounting turnover is expensive and disruptive.

The average tenure for an accountant is 2-3 years. When someone leaves, you lose:

• Institutional knowledge
• Process continuity
• 3-6 months of productivity while you recruit and onboard

With outsourcing, turnover is the vendor's problem, not yours. If someone on the outsourced team leaves, they replace them within days, not months.

One NetSuite consulting firm we work with had a 100% retention rate on their outsourced team over 3 years. Their internal team? They replaced 2 accountants in that same period, costing them $60,000 in recruiting and lost productivity.

Atticus's average staff retention rate: 91%

That's not industry-standard offshore. That's best-in-class stability.
‍

5. Improved Audit Readiness

Outsourced teams work from documented, repeatable processes. That means:

• Cleaner work papers
• Consistent GL coding
• Better supporting documentation
• Easier audit trails

One software company we supported cut their annual audit prep time from 80 hours to 20 hours after outsourcing their GL maintenance. Their auditors specifically noted the improved documentation quality.

Value of audit time saved: 60 hours x $80/hour = $4,800/year
‍

6. Scalability Without Headcount Risk

When you hire in-house, you're locked in. If revenue drops or you need to cut costs, layoffs are expensive and demoralizing.

With outsourcing, you can scale services up or down with 30 days' notice.

Need extra support during a system implementation? Add capacity for 3 months, then scale back.

Experiencing seasonal fluctuations? Increase AP/AR support during peak months, reduce during slow periods.

This flexibility is worth thousands in avoided severance and recruiting costs.
‍

7. Access to Specialized Expertise

When you hire a Senior Accountant, you get their specific skill set. If they don't know NetSuite revenue recognition or multi-currency accounting, you're paying to train them.

When you outsource, you get access to the vendor's entire bench of specialists.

• Need someone with Celigo integration experience? They've got it.
• Need someone who's done 20 NetSuite implementations? They've got it.
• Need someone who knows Australian exchange rate compliance? They've got it.

One Australian import/distribution company we worked with needed help with USD transaction reporting. 

Our team had the NetSuite expertise to fix their exchange rate discrepancies and add QR code payment options to invoices; skills their internal team didn't have.

Quantified benefit of expertise access:

Instead of hiring a $110K specialist for a 6-month project, you pay $4,000-$6,000/month for the duration of the project. 

Savings: $35,000-$45,000.
‍

Decision Framework: When to Hire vs. When to Outsource

Outsourcing isn't always the answer. Here's when each model makes sense:
‍

When In-House Hiring Makes Sense

You should build an in-house team if:

‍

When Outsourcing Makes Sense

You should outsource if:

One fast-growing software company we support was stuck in recruiting limbo. 

They'd been trying to hire 2 accountants for 6 months. Every candidate either wanted $20K more than budget or accepted a counteroffer.

They shifted to outsourcing and had a full team operational in 3 weeks. 

Time saved in recruiting? 5 months. Opportunity cost of delayed hires? Immeasurable.
‍

Your Move: Cost Savings or Strategic Transformation?

Outsourcing saves you $275,000-$300,000 per year compared to hiring a 3-person in-house team.

But the real value isn't the cost savings. It's what you get in return:

• Faster closes (10 days saved)
• Better accuracy (2.5% error reduction)
• Freed-up internal capacity (200+ hours/month for strategic work)
• Reduced turnover risk (91% retention vs. industry average)
• Improved audit readiness
• Scalability without HR nightmares

The companies winning right now aren't the ones with the biggest finance teams. They're the ones with the leanest, most effective operations.

If you're still building headcount to solve capacity problems, you're fighting the last war.

Ready to see what outsourcing could save your company?

Get your custom outsourcing ROI analysis here. 

We'll walk through your current team structure, close timeline, and cost breakdown, then show you exactly what a tailored outsourcing model would look like for your business.

Because the question isn't whether outsourcing is cheaper. It's whether you can afford to keep doing it the old way.

Get Your Custom Outsourcing ROI Analysis →

‍

‍